Saturday, February 23, 2013

Forward Day By Day


The Forward Day by Day Meditation for February 23, 2013

Hebrews 5:1-10. Jesus offered up prayers... with loud cries and tears, to the one who was able to save him from death, and he was heard.
When someone says, “God heard my prayer,” it usually means that the answer exactly mirrored a request, yet Jesus prayed with tears for rescue, was heard by the Almighty who could’ve prevented death, and Jesus died. No reflection on God’s hearing! A much larger picture, a merciful picture, was in focus: human redemption.
And I need to reflect on such truth when I question God’s response to my prayers. Do I dare to think that I fully understand the larger picture behind the scenes? Am I forgetting that God’s wisdom is far higher than mine? Am I thinking God doesn't pay attention? Not wanting to do an injustice to the one listener who waits nonstop to hear us, we need to clarify our thinking when results aren't made-to-order. If God’s response to prayer is mystifying, don’t we need to recall that the goal of prayer isn't to manipulate the divine? Isn't the goal communication? (Emphasis mine.) 
We can pray: “God, help me remember that prayer is the privilege of conversation with you, an enduring and honest expression of relationship. Amen.” We can count on it: God’s response will mirror this prayer.

To view this meditation on its original web site go to: Forward Day By Day .

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

God is Our Place of Safety

One of the Psalms in the Common Lectionary for today February 5 is Psalm 62. As I read this Psalm I was struck by two verses and how they may apply to each of us as individuals and how they also could apply to our nation. As translated in the Contemporary English Version verse 8 says, "Trust in God, my friends, and always tell him each one of your concerns. God is our place of safety." Verse 10 in this version reads, "Don't trust in violence or depend on dishonesty or rely on great wealth." (highlights are mine.) 

As a nation where do we find our "...place of safety"? Is it in what the Psalm would suggest or is it in our military, the strongest and most highly finances on the planet as a result of our, "...great wealth"?  Is it perhaps in drones that allows us to strike at perceived enemies anywhere with impunity and indicates that we "...trust in violence"?

As we consider the current gun debate (who can have guns, how accessible should they be, etc.) should we consider where our, "...place of safety" is? Do we, "trust in violence" or in the relative "great wealth" we have that allows us to purchase these instruments whose main purpose is killing? (Have you ever noticed how the gun lobby and the NRA says that an individual with a gun can "dispatch" anyone who is threatening them? "Dispatch", what an interesting euphemism for kill.)

The questions above and how they are answered can go a long way in deciding where we put our trust. Jesus said, in reference to money, "Your heart will always be where your treasure is." (Matthew 12:34) This can also apply to safety. If ones safety is invested in violence your heart will be with power, violence, and guns.  

Monday, February 4, 2013

The Idolatry of Money

Anyone looking at the title of this post might think sarcastically, "No kidding; what a deep thought." And I agree that this has been observed and discussed by moralists and religious thinkers (go all the way back to Jesus and before) for some time. So why do I decide to put this into my blog today (Jan. 26, 2013)? Often on Saturday morning I will listen to all or part of the MSNBC program Up W/ Chris. Two of the topics this morning were the Keystone XL Pipeline and the tramatic brain injuries suffered by NFL football players. Also, during a commercial break I looked at my E-mails that had come in overnight. One of the E-mails was a plea by an organization to encourage people to sign a petition. The goal of the petition was to encourage the Olympic Organizing Committee to pressure Japan to stop an annual dolphin hunt as a condition for receiving the 2020 Olympics in their country. These may all sound like quite different subjects or if you prefer causes. I think that causes is the appropriate term because the people that advocate for them are trying to accomplish what they see as a greater good. So what ties them together? The similarity in each case is money and the difficulty of reaching a positive outcome because of the power of money.

Take first the case of the pipeline. The negative aspect of this project is that the crude extracted from the oil sands in Canada that would flow down the pipeline through the United States is the dirtiest form of oil and burning it would release copious amounts of carbon into the atmosphere thereby hastening Global Warming. If one accepts that Global Warming is destructive to the planet (and the vast majority of scientists do) this is therefor a project that obviously should not be completed. So what keeps the project going? Money. The money that can be made selling this destructive product to other countries.

Now look at the question of traumatic brain injuries to football players. Relatively recently there has been an increasing amount of attention paid to this subject as a result of studies of the brains of NFL players who have died and had suffered from a variety of neurologically debilitating conditions prior to their deaths. The evidence, as a result of these studies, is that the concussions suffered by the players during their careers is the cause of the neurological conditions. Although, there have been some improvements in helmets and rules the game goes on almost completely as before with few changes. Why so few changes? Again, money is the answer. The vast sums of money made by the owners, the league and the players and a whole orbit of businesses that revolve around the NFL.

The last topic that caught my attention via E-mail was the slaughter of the dolphins. Why does the hunt for these intelligent, endangered creatures continue? As in the examples sited above the answer is money. The money to be made by the fishermen, wholesalers of the meat, and the restauranteurs in Japan.

Money, or perhaps the desire for money, trumps what many would consider the greater good. In the case of the NFL players money trumps the health and welfare of the individual. In the cases of the tar sands and the dolphins money trumps the greater good of the planet and the creatures God created that inhabit it. This unreasonable desire for money that overrides every other consideration can be seen as the worship of wealth of money. The worship of anything other than the God that created this universe has to be labeled for what it is idolotry. Idolatry is a subject that has irritated me for many years. If one goes back to the beginning of this blog you will see that I started it because of the idolatrous worship of the national flag in a small local church. I will not bother now with the detales of that other than to say that many people there wanted to make it the fourth member of the trinity.

Perhaps we need a definition of idolatry at this point:
In part, according to Wickepedia; "Idolatry is a pejorative term for the worship of an idol, a physical object such as a cult image, as a god,[1]or practices believed to verge on worship, such as giving undue honour and regard to created forms other than God....Behaviour considered idolatrous or potentially idolatrous may include the creation of any type of image of the deity, ...and the use of religious symbols, or secular ones. In addition, theologians have extended the concept to include giving undue importance to aspects of religion other than God, or to non-religious aspects of life in general, with no involvement of images specifically. For example, theCatechism of the Catholic Church states: "Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. Man commits idolatry whenever he honours and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods, or demons (for example satanism),powerpleasureraceancestorsthe statemoney etc."[2]" (Emphasis mine.) 

When money is given the status of a god (viewed idolatrously) the predictable outcome is negative. It is contrary to the common good and therefor evil. We are told in 1 Timothy 6: 9 - 10a, "Those who long to be rich, however, stumble into temptation and a trap and many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is the root of all evil..."                      

Friday, December 21, 2012

Wake up, Question, Act

The following was written by Laurie Gudim a religious iconographer and liturgical artist, a writer and lay preacher living in Fort Collins, CO. in the Speaking to the Soul section of The Episcopal Cafe' on December 20, 2012 just days after the murder of 20 children and 6 adults in CT. What follows are the first sentences of several paragraphs in her meditation. several of the quotes end with question marks. This is, I think, a good way of approaching and strengthening ones faith because questions allow for the possibility of answers to difficult questions and, hopefully, in return a stronger faith. 

"According to Matthew, John the Baptist was the Voice in the Wilderness, ...
The Baptizer used a technique kind of like that of a Zen master who hits his follower with a rod to wake him up. ...
The stick, in John’s case, is strong words. ...
“Wake up,” he is saying. “What good are your schemes and dreams? What good is your life? Your religion? Your heritage?...
These days we don’t have a prophet to help us wake up to what’s important. Instead we have world events. ...
We can look at all these events as evil running rampant in the world and hide away,...
But if we go down this path our suspicion and fear will grow, feeding on itself like some monster. ...
A healthier response might be to see in the world events that terrify us the opportunity to be shocked awake. What the heck are we doing, that these horrible things can occur? The responsibility belongs to all of us. What good is our religion? Our heritage? If we examine our lives, individually and collectively, what difference do they really make?..."
(Above emphasis is mine.)

The gospel lesson for this meditation is Matthew 3:1-12.

The complete text of the meditation can be found at:
http://www.episcopalcafe.com/thesoul/daily_reading/wake_up.htm

Friday, November 30, 2012

What truly matters during the season - Leonard Pitts Jr. - MiamiHerald.com

From the end of Leonard Pitts Jr.'s column he said, ".. the things we need most in this life cannot be found in temples of commerce or bought at any price."


"IN MY OPINION

What truly matters during the season

 
 

LPITTS@MIAMIHERALD.COM

Bing Crosby would be appalled.
With singer Carol Richards, the great crooner once popularized a song, Silver Bells, about the joy of Christmas shopping. “Strings of street lights,” it went, “even stop lights, blink a bright and red and green as the shoppers rush home with their treasures.”
Of course, that was in 1950, a more genteel era when men still wore hats and women still wore gloves. These days, one would be well-advised to wear Kevlar."
To read the balance of his column click on the link below.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/11/28/3116223_what-truly-matters-during-the.html#storylink=addthis#storylink=cpy

What truly matters during the season - Leonard Pitts Jr. - MiamiHerald.com

Friday, November 16, 2012

The miracle of Malala Yousafzai against Taliban in Pakistan

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/11/13/3095659/the-miracle-of-malala-yousafzai.html#morer#storylink=cpy

 Two quotes from the Leonard Pitts' column that appeared in the (Utica, NY) Observer Dispatch about Malala Yousufzai the school girl that the Taliban attempted to assasinate: "...punitive people of faith are often too glib, facile and mean in claiming to have divined the divine. Just as often, their interpretations say less about God than about them, the things they hate and fear, the narrowness of their vision, the niggardliness of their souls." A second quote: "Take it all as a stark reminder that too often, people who speak glibly of the will of God really describe no will higher than their own. They presume to interpret God like tarot cards of the stock market,..." This is true not only of the Taliban but some people who are Christen, Jewish, or from some other faith group can make the same mistake. 

To read all of Leonard Pitts' column go to: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/11/13/3095659/the-miracle-of-malala-yousafzai.html#morer


Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Why Obama and not Romney. Their Perspectives. 

In an article on God's Politics A blog by Jim Wallis and Friends Eugene Cho in his article Thou Shalt Follow These 10 Commandments for the Presidential Election, said "I’m not suggesting that the elections aren’t important. They are. They always are. There is much at stake. But in truth, they’re always advertised as the most important election in human history that will change the trajectory of all things for eternity."

If one looks at the country from a distance and as a whole this appears to be true. However if one looks at segments of the population or at individuals the story appears to be different. Extrapolating from what has been said on the campaign trail by the Romney organization much of the Social Safety net would be shreaded. The Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) would be repealed and replaced by a voucher system. The likely outcome of that would be that individuals with serious (read expensive) illnesses could easily eat through the voucher and then would be personally responsible for the balance (read this as bankrupt individuals, loss of homes,etc.) 

Another of the possible examples is tax policy. During the campaign Romney has indicated that taxes would be raised on middle income and working class families and lowered on the wealthy. Their theory is that the wealthy would then take that money that they don't pay in taxes and invest it in industry and therefor create jobs. It is a good theory except for one problem; in the real world it does not work. History tells us this is true. What has happened when it was tried? One example is the Koch  Brothers. As their tax rate decreased so did the number of people working in their various companies. Another example; investors took what they did not have to pay in taxes, invested it in companies, moved the companies over seas to places like China and, oh yes, created jobs there. Any other left over money that was not paid in taxes was sheltered in offshore tax havens such as the Bahamas or the Caiman Islands. 

Then there is the attitude of the upper 1% that has been on display during the campaign that inadvertently shows through. Governor Romney's comment that his wife had "several" Cadillacs or the need for him to have a car elivator in on of his homes illustrates this. Another illustration is his suggestion that children who want to go to college should borrow the money from their parents. That isn't realistic in my world and it is not realistic in the world of most people in this country.  The problem here is not that success is bad or envied. The problem is that Romney and many in his economic class have lost touch with the vast majority of the population in the US and what life is like for them; if indeed they ever knew. They have an attitude of entitlement. 

The idea that the US would not crumble into dust no matter who is elected president is probably true. What is also true however is that life for the vast majority of people in this country will be far more difficult and much less fulfilling with the election of Romney to the presidency. For the people at the bottom of our economic ladder the resulting Romney presidency would be devistating if not life threatening. If you think life threatening is to extreme an argument consider his assertion that FEMA should be broken up with the responsibilities turned over to state and local authorities. That would have worked well during our most recent natural disaster huricane Sandy wouldn't it.  

The re-election of President Obama however would be the exact opposite affect of what is described above. President Obama's life story is much different than Romney's. His background is that of a middle income working class family, His understands their struggles, both economic and personal. The programs he has managed to have passed, without the help of a reluctant Republican legislature, reflects that understanding. If the president of the United States is to represent the majority of the citizens of the US then the choice of President Obama is clear.